Peer Review Process

The FISYS (Frontier of Information System and Technology) implements a rigorous peer review process to maintain high academic quality and integrity of published works. Every submitted manuscript undergoes a fair, unbiased, and timely review by experts in the relevant field.

1. Initial Screening

All manuscripts are initially reviewed by the editorial board to ensure they fit the scope and comply with the submission guidelines of FISYS.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers. FISYS applies a double-blind review system, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous to ensure objectivity.

3. Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, clarity, methodology, contribution to the field, and adherence to ethical standards in research and publication.

4. Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor decides whether the manuscript is accepted, requires revision, or is rejected. Revised manuscripts may be re-reviewed before final acceptance.

5. Publication

Accepted manuscripts are copyedited, proofread, and published online in the FISYS journal system, ensuring global accessibility.