Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to WellSafe undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of the published articles. The process is conducted in a fair and unbiased manner as follows:

1. Initial Screening: The editorial team reviews the submission for scope, format, and plagiarism check.
2. Assignment to Reviewers: Suitable manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
3. Double-Blind Review: Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure impartiality.
4. Reviewers’ Recommendations: Reviewers provide feedback, comments, and recommendations (accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject).
5. Editorial Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on reviewers’ comments and the quality of revisions.
6. Revision and Resubmission: Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewers’ feedback.
7. Final Acceptance: After successful revisions, the manuscript is accepted for publication.
8. Proofreading and Publication: Accepted manuscripts go through copyediting, proofreading, and final layout before publication.

WellSafe is committed to maintaining high academic and ethical standards in every stage of the peer review process.