

- People
- Editorial Team
- Contact
- Policies
- Focus and Scope
- Journal History
- Indexing and Abstracting
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving Policy
- Deposit Policy
- Publication Ethics Statement
- Allegations of Misconduct
- Screening for Plagiarism
- Correction and Retraction
- Direct Marketing
- Advertising
- Revenue Source
- Crossmark Policy
- Submission
- Author Guidelines
- Article Processing Charge
- Copyright Notice
- Privacy Statement
- Flag Counter
- Recommended Tools


WELLSAFE | Journal of Applied Non-Clinical Health Sciences
Allegations of Misconduct
WellSafe: Journal of Applied Non-Clinical Health Sciences
WellSafe is firmly committed to addressing any allegations of research or publication misconduct with fairness, confidentiality, and diligence. Misconduct may include but is not limited to:
- Plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
- Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting of data.
- Unethical research practices or lack of required ethical approvals.
- Improper authorship attribution or ghostwriting.
- Duplicate or redundant publication.
Investigation Procedure
- Initial Assessment: Allegations are reviewed confidentially by the editorial office.
- Communication: Authors or involved parties are contacted for clarification or evidence.
- Formal Review: If necessary, an investigation is carried out in accordance with COPE guidelines.
- Decision: Outcomes may include manuscript correction, retraction, or rejection.
- Follow-up: Relevant institutions may be notified, and sanctions may be applied.
These measures ensure that WellSafe maintains the integrity, transparency, and trustworthiness of the scholarly record.